How the twain shall meet -- II: Truth and fitness
Staying on the topic of (the false dilemma between) East vs West, here is another common misconception: " Understanding Eastern (dharmic) thought needs one to suspend the use of logic." Even in my previous post, one of the comments asked whether I'm implying that we need axioms without logic to understand Eastern thought. I'm not sure that means though, but I guess it means something like the above stated belief. Suspending the use of logic means speaking nonsense or committing a logical fallacy. For instance, if I argued that, "All fish swim, I too swim, therefore I am a fish." Now that is an example of suspension of logic. Speaking about emotions or proposing a model comprising of abstract, intangible elements (like chakras for example) or even proposing the existence of something that cannot be proved by logic, does not make something illogical. Science is full of models built on intangible axioms. Newtonian physics for example, is built upon the...